About this blog

  • In Shakespeare's The Tempest, Prospero, Duke of Milan, is ousted by his brother and exiled to an island. With the help of a friend, Prospero manages to take with him his beloved library.

    Prospero, like his creator, lived in a time when boundaries between disciplines were not as rigid as they are today. Prospero's books would have dealt with the cosmos—spiritual and material, inner and outer—as a whole.

    In this blog, I try to do the same. I'm not Prospero, just a student rummaging through his library and writing in the margins. Prospero's Books is a blog about seeing the world as a whole, by looking at

    • signs, especially the relationships between signifiers and what they signify
    • stories, especially big-picture stories, such as myths and the works of Dante, Shakespeare, and Joyce
    • systems, especially complex, nonlinear systems
    • spirit, especially as understood by the Christian and Western esoteric traditions

    Welcome! Please join the conversation.

    —Kenneth W. Davis

    (Note: Although I admire Peter Greenaway's film Prospero's Books, this blog is not directly about that film. )

    Who, and Some of What, I Am

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

« Sytems, Shakespeare, and Intertextuality: Premise 13 | Main | Systems, Shakespeare, and Intertextuality: Premise 14 »

09 April 2006

The universe of Guildenstern and Rosencrantz

R_and_g_are_dead_poster_from_bsf Last night's excellent performance of Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead by the Baltimore Shakespeare Festival * reminded me that the play is one of the twentieth century's most poignant treatments of the human effort to find meaning in a universe seen as meaningless.

In The View from the Center of the Universe (see What I've Been Reading) Primack and Abrams write:

Perhaps the existentialists saw the universe as inherently meaningless because they understood it so poorly. . . . Existential terror is a response to a universe seen as infinite or at least incomprehensibly large, almost empty, and with no apparent purpose, so that to avoid total absurdity individuals must create meaning for themselves. This response has permated our culture so thoroughly that many people assume that the existential stance is scientifically justified. But its fundamental assumption that the universe has no higher level of organization is wrong scientifically and an aberration historically (82-83).

*In the interest of full disclosure, I'm the proud papa of the BSF's development director. And I've been a fan of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern since I saw its first New York run in 1967-68.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/779118/4628775

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The universe of Guildenstern and Rosencrantz:

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Search Prospero's Books


  • WWW
    www.prosperosbooks.net

What I've been reading